ng28
热线电话:027-9844312
热门关键词:
您所在的位置:主页 > 新闻中心

这两个哪个判了点球?为什么?利物浦vs皇马、莱万特vs巴萨(利物浦战皇马与莱万特战巴萨:哪次判了点球?原因是什么?)

发布时间:2026-01-16

Clarifying handball rules

56092

I should provide clear criteria along with a quick answer template like, “If you mean X, then Y.” It's essential to ask for clarification and respect any network restrictions I have. I won't run commands but keep my response concise. I’ll also ask for video timestamps or images while mentioning the IFAB Laws of the Game handball criteria.

片段吗

Here’s a quick bullet list of likely scenarios: if the support arm is involved—no penalty; if the arm is extended, it could be a penalty unless certain conditions apply. Distance and reaction time are important here too!Crafting the Chinese answer

nce

I need to provide a more specific response, asking for details like the match season, timing, and visuals. I’ll differentiate the key factors based on arm position, whether it's a support arm, distance, and reaction time. If it's close distance, usually it’s not penalized; if the arm is raised or extended, it could be a penalty. I'll also note VAR standards for clear errors.

For examples, I'll phrase them conditionally, saying things like, "If Liverpool vs. Real Madrid involved a defender's slide tackle with the support arm touching the ball, it typically wouldn’t be a penalty." Lastly, I’ll ask the user if they prefer to send images or short videos for detailed reasoning!

能给下具体片段吗?最好有两球的时间点或截图/动图。不同赛季/回合会有不同争议,我不想猜错。

离意外

判不判点球,现行手球判罚大致看这些点:

  • 手/臂是否让身体“显得更大”(不自然张开、横张、上举)
  • 距离与反应时间(近距离被动触球通常不判)
  • 是否先打到自己身上再蹭到手(多半不判,除非手臂明显扩大范围且阻挡了有威胁的球)
  • 是否为滑铲“支撑手”(撑地那只手多为不判)
  • 触球是否改变了进攻的明显结果(挡射门/明显传中更易判)
  • VAR只会纠正“明显、清楚的错误”,场上判定优先

如果你说的是那种场景:

  • 利物浦vs皇马:后卫滑铲、撑地手被打到,或近距离折射到手,多数不会判点球。
  • 莱万特vs巴萨:防守队员手臂外张挡下射门/传中,非支撑手、且不是近距离意外,多数会判点球。

把两次的画面或时间点发来,我按上述标准逐条说明“判/不判”的原因。

ion

ng28

地址:江西省景德镇市珠山区新厂街道

电话:027-9844312

邮箱:admin@home-china-ng28.com